#Digital performer vs logic pro#
#Digital performer vs logic series#
#Digital performer vs logic windows#

#Digital performer vs logic pro#

Brand new for DP7, however, is the ability to act as a fully integrated software front-end to Pro Tools HD hardware. First off, AAF file interchange enables song sessions to be swapped seamlessly between Pro Tools and DP7.

Tooled up Digital Performer is compatible with Pro Tools in several ways. It's a bit like punch in/out for automation and is most welcome - every little helps in speeding up the mixing process.įor those who require notation facilities, you can now create lead scores with lyrics and chord symbols, which can easily be printed (to paper or PDF) for other musicians. Mixer automation has been enhanced with the addition of four 'range' modes that enable you to adjust mix automation only within a specified section, leaving data outside the range unaffected. A V-Rack is essentially a virtual effects rack that can be assigned to whatever instrument, aux or master track you like, but only now can you view them within the Mixing Desk window alongside your other tracks. Still on the effects front, the V-Racks of previous DP versions are present and correct. Unfortunately, the in-line chain is set to EQ followed by compression - the facility to toggle the order would be useful. It's very handy to be able to call these up without wading through vast plug-in folders.

#Digital performer vs logic series#

The compact interface can control any of DP's bundled EQs and compressors, including the MasterWorks series of vintage console EQs and dynamics models, which are certainly right up there with the best of bundled DAW plug-ins. New on DP's channel strip are in-line EQ and dynamic controls - essentially these are just default inserts that can be switched on and off as required, which is a neat aid to working quickly and efficiently. What's new?Ī new window tab gives you direct access to the channel strip of the selected track, much like in Logic. This is quicker than opening and closing separate projects because shared samples, etc, don't have to be reloaded. You can have any number of Chunks open within a project and each can consist of individual songs or cues. Worthy of special note is the aforementioned Chunks feature - it's this that makes DP so great for live playback, film scoring and other sound design-based work. On a more positive note, the consolidated window has improved no end from earlier versions, and with a bit of delving, it's not hard to get your head around the arrangement and customisation of the various tabbed window options.

#Digital performer vs logic windows#

Proprietary language for common elements ('Sound Bites' for audio, 'Chunks' for a group of open songs) hampers understanding, and the plethora of confusing windows can be a frightening prospect to a newbie. As with any software, it's bound to take a little time to become familiar with its way of working, but MOTU doesn't always make it easy for newcomers to fathom its app.

One area that's always been criticised in DP is the layout of its interface. There are also instant beat-slicing and audio quantising functions, which can give great results.' 'DP's audio recording, editing, grouping and so on are all handled very elegantly.